Consumer Legal Protection Against Overclaims for Skincare Products in Advertisements
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52909/jemeb.v4i2.163Keywords:
Legal Protection, Overclaim, SkincareAbstract
This research aims to analyze consumer protection against the practice of overclaims in skincare product advertisements, which often feature excessive claims regarding product benefits and quality. Overclaims can mislead consumers and potentially cause health risks and financial losses. In the legal context, Law No. 8/1999 on Consumer Protection and regulations issued by the Food and Drug Administration (BPOM) have provided a regulatory framework to protect consumers from misleading advertisements. This research uses a normative juridical method with a statutory approach and a case study of skincare product advertisements that are proven to overclaim. The results show that the formation of regulations has explicitly provided consumer protection for the fulfillment of the right to information such as in Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, where business actors are required to provide information that is honest, true, and not misleading. Also, BPOM Regulation Number 32 of 2021 concerning Supervision of Cosmetics Advertising. Business actors who are proven to overclaim are fully responsible for the losses suffered by consumers. They can be held accountable through compensation mechanisms and other legal sanctions. Consumer protection against overclaims in skincare product advertisements needs to be improved through a synergy between strong regulations, effective supervision, and increased consumer awareness to prevent wider negative impacts.
References
Dewi, E.W. (2015). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2015.
Harianto, D. (2010). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Konsumen terhadap Iklan yang Menesatkan. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
K. Martono. (2007). Kamus Hukum dan Regulasi Penerbangan, Edisi Pertama. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Kristiyanti, C.T.S. (2008). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Jakrta: Sinar Grafika, 2008.
Miru, A., Yodo, S. (2004). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Muthiah, A. (2018). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Dimensi Hukum Positif dan Ekonomi Syariah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press.
Rosmawati. (2018). Pokok -Pokok Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Depok: Prenadamedia Group.
Wardiono, K. (2014). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.
Izza, D.W., Zavira, S, (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Klinik Kecantikan Atas Penggunaan Kosmetik Racikan Dokter. Perspektif, 25 (2).
Kuncoro, A.A.P. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Terhadap Penggunaan Kata Overclaim Pada Iklan Produk Skincare. Skripsi. Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Nabilla, Sapto, Asianto. (2024). Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Atas Overclaim Sun Protection Factor (SPF)Pada Produk Tabir Surya X. Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Vol.1, No.2.
Liputan 6 News. (2024, October 7). Dokter Estetika Ungkap Daftar Skincare yang Overclaim hingga Ditemukan Bahan Berbahaya Hidrokuinon. https://www.liputan6.com/lifestyle/read/5740994/dokter-estetika-ungkap-daftar-skincare-yang-overclaim-hingga-ditemukan-bahan-berbahaya-hidrokuinon?page=4.
Maria Marcia, Cheryl Amadea. (2023, March 16). Perkembangan Industri Kosmetik di Tahun 2023. https://east.vc/id/insights-id/perkembangan-industri-kosmetik-di-tahun-2023/.
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.
Peraturan BPOM Nomor 23 Tahun 2019 tentang Persyaratan Teknis Bahan Kosmetika lampiran III Daftar Bahan Pengawet yang Diizinkan dalm Kosmetika.
Peraturan BPOM Nomor 23 Tahun 2020 tentang Persyaratan Teknis Penandaan Bahan Kosmetika.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sri Astutik, Wahyu Prawesthi, Zulaikha Zulaikha, Fedianty Augustinah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.